E-Mail
Print
tool name
close
Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2009
Our View: High-speed rail money makes sense
Why shouldn't California get a sizable chunk? And why shouldn't $1.4B come to the Valley?
California's high-speed rail advocates are lobbying for a sizable chunk of the $8 billion in federal high-speed rail funding that's available.
California's application includes about $1.3 billion for San Joaquin Valley routes that would run from Merced to Bakersfield.
The remainder of the application, about $3.4 billion, would include segments for San Francisco to San Jose and Los Angeles to Anaheim.
With 23 states going after the federal funding, California will have to prove its application is worthy, especially considering that the Golden State wants more than half of the federal money available.
California High-Speed Rail Authority leaders were on Capitol Hill lobbying for the state's $4.7 billion funding request.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, and Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer have also been pushing California's application with federal officials.
California would be perfect for high-speed rail because of the large distances between major cities and the need to get motorists off the state's crowded freeways.
For Valley residents, a high-speed rail system would offer quick and efficient transportation to the Bay Area and Southern California. It would help improve the Valley's air quality, and give residents other transportation options.
In addition, this massive public works project would create high-paying jobs in construction and related industries. The Valley could use those jobs right now.
If Merced County wins the contract for the system's maintenance facility at the Castle Airport, it would give a tremendous boost to our economy and future.
California voters helped the state's quest for a high-speed rail system in 2008 when they approved a bond that includes $9 billion to jump-start construction.
The entire system in California could cost $40 billion, and the rest of the funding must come from other sources, including state and federal funds and private donations.
We believe high-speed rail is part of our nation's future. It will reduce dependence on foreign oil, lower greenhouse gas emissions and provide a cheaper alternative to costly air travel.
There's no better place to start with high-speed rail than California. And right here in Merced.
Editorials are the opinion of the Merced Sun-Star editorial board. Members of the editorial board include Publisher Hank Vander Veen, Executive Editor Mike Tharp, Editorial Page Editor Keith Jones, Copy Desk Chief Jesse Chenault and Online Editor Brandon Bowers.
A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free, CIVIL and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy mercedsunstar.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines. Here are the ground rules:
1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name , that user will be warned or banned.
2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.
On most news stories, the commenting period is closed after three days. If you wish to continue a discussion, please use The Sunspot forum.
@Nyx.CommentBody@