Search for
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Bookmark and Share

email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print

Comments (0)
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Multimedia

Friday, Nov. 09, 2007

Locals express frustration at air meeting

Board members hope some clean-air goals can be met by 2017.

Tom Schmidt, of Merced, was sad he couldn't view the mountains from an overpass this week -- and he blamed the Valley's pollution.

"I can see the air is filthy," he told about 70 other Merced County residents and representatives from the California Air Resources Board and San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. They were part of a community meeting Wednesday at Tenaya Middle School.

Paramedic Frank Kelly, also of Merced, announced that he was sick of treating so many people for severe asthma symptoms. Others expressed concerns about truck emissions, land use and the politics and expenses of reaching clean-air goals.

"How many people here think air quality in the San Joaquin Valley is a problem?" Melissa Kelly-Ortega of the Merced/Mariposa County Asthma Coalition asked the crowd.

Not surprisingly, everyone raised their hands.

This meeting was one of three led by a California Air Resources Board task force to gather the public's thoughts and concerns about air quality.

The task force was formed after a June air board meeting in which it became clear that the goal of cleaning up the Valley's air by 2024 wasn't well received by the public. "We are offended being told that we can't get clean air until 2024," Kelly-Ortega said.

State air board member Dorene D'Adamo led the task force to study further options. Meetings in Parlier, Arvin and Merced to collect the public's suggestions were an important part of this process, she said.

The task force publicly proclaimed the Merced meeting a success.

There was a solid turnout of residents, businesses and agricultural interests. People introduced a range of concerns and appeared genuinely interested in being part of the process to speed up the cleanup of Valley air.

Saundra West, of Oakdale, cited financial issues that businesses face in meeting air quality regulations when she discussed her trucking business. She recently found out it would cost about $73,000 to retrofit her trucks.

"The truck value is $15,000, so you put us at a disadvantage," she said. "I ask you to help us, get us money to upgrade our fleet. ... We are held to high standards, but we can't operate, losing money."

Meeting members appeared sympathetic to West's situation.

How seriously all these comments will be taken by the state air board remains to be seen, task force member Kelly-Ortega and various community members said that evening.

A couple of hours before that meeting, the task force itself met at the County Administration Building to review its findings so far. It also released a report that it will present to the governing members of the state air board in Sacramento next week.

More pollution reductions are possible, and the San Joaquin Valley's ozone cleanup won't be as hard as previously thought. One finding was that rules on state-regulated diesel engines can reduce tons of air pollution.

This and other discoveries led the task force to announce that 90 percent of clean-air goals can be met by 2017. But the remaining 10 percent won't be met until the original completion target of 2024.

The task force -- which includes state air board members, the Asthma Coalition, Air Pollution Control District members, county officials, activists and industry representatives -- conveyed these findings later to the community meeting.

"The message is, 'Yes, we've had improvements, but we aren't where we want to be,'" said task force member Judy Case, a Fresno County supervisor. "More work needs to be done."

This met a mixed reception from the public. "I'm frustrated," said Kelly, the Merced paramedic. "If we have an opportunity to fix things, quit screwing around and get things done."

One future plan announced was the presentation of a spring forum at UC Merced to educate people about new technology to reduce pollution.

UC Merced professor Henry Forman said the air board should do more to support the university's research. He and other scientists, or as he termed them, "lab rats," are studying air pollution issues. "The reason you can't see the mountains is particles, not ozone," he said. "Do we really know how to make the best diesel engine? We don't know. ... Do we know if particles produced by intentional fires are worse or better? We don't know -- we need more research."

The state air board doesn't fund any research on campus, but it should, he added. D'Adamo agreed and encouraged Forman to apply for its research program.

"We are just thrilled the campus is here," she said. "We are looking forward to more collaboration."

Reporter Dhyana Levey can be reached at 209-385-2472 or dlevey@mercedsun-star.com.






A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free, CIVIL and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy mercedsunstar.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines. Here are the ground rules:
1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name , that user will be warned or banned.
2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.
On most news stories, the commenting period is closed after three days. If you wish to continue a discussion, please use The Sunspot forum.
Quick Job Search