We recommend voting against Proposition 38, which we see as a dangerous ballot-box budgeting scheme. We also must recommend that voters reject Proposition 30. It is not a recommendation we make lightly or with any relish whatsoever because we acknowledge the state has significant fiscal wounds that might be salved by passing this proposition. But we also know that those wounds have been self-inflicted, largely by elected officials who simply don't know how to say no to any influential interest group, be they public employees, business, other labor unions or environmental groups.
We would argue that Proposition 30 is like taking an Alka-Seltzer for your aching head when you need brain surgery.
Proposition 30 is not so much a solution as it is a cynical political calculation meant to determine just how much the voters will tolerate. And those voters have had to tolerate a lot recently.
While claiming poverty, the Legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown forged ahead with the ill-advised and costly high-speed rail boondoggle.
While threatening to close state parks because of a $22 million deficit, the state suddenly "found" more than $50 million, which leaves voters wondering if that is the tip of the budget iceberg.
We love California. We love public schools. We recognize they need and deserve more help and we would support reasonable tax changes to do that. But neither Proposition 30 nor Proposition 38 is the answer.
The fiscal abyss in this state has become so wide that no short-term, incremental solution can bridge it. We need a Grand Bargain, if you will, but that will only happen when all sides are desperate enough to make it happen.
Resounding no votes on Propositions 30 and 38 can be the dynamite charge necessary to rattle Sacramento and force such a Grand Compromise.
-- Contra Costa Times, Oct. 7