Fate of Brown's Prop. 30 much too close to call

By JULIET WILLIAMS
The Associated Press
November 7, 2012 

LOS ANGELES — California voters rejected a broad-based income tax increase to fund the state’s beleaguered public schools Tuesday, while they approved tougher penalties for people convicted of human trafficking and revised the harshest three-strikes law in the nation, allowing for shorter sentences for some offenders.

One of the most closely watched initiatives, Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposal to raise sales and income taxes to help balance the state budget, remained too close to call, as did measures to repeal the death penalty and require labeling on genetically engineered foods.

Those were among a slate of 11 weighty ballot measures facing California voters Tuesday.

Brown’s initiative, Proposition 30, asked voters to raise income taxes on those making more than $250,000 a year and sales taxes on everyone to help balance the state budget and avoid about $6 billion in cuts, mostly to schools.

The spending cuts already are built into this year’s state budget, and Democrats warned of dire results if the taxes were not approved, including some school districts that could shorten the school year by as many as three weeks.

The Democratic governor spent the final two weeks trying to remind voters of the choice, and Democrats toted his Welsh corgi, Sutter, around the state trying to boost enthusiasm. Recent public opinion polls showed the initiative falling below the 50 percent threshold needed for passage, but Brown’s supporters were focused on the 14 percent of likely voters who were undecided. They believed a few hundred thousand votes could push it over the top.

Brown faced competition from a rival proposal to broadly raise income taxes and send the money directly to public school districts. That initiative, Proposition 38, was funded by wealthy civil rights attorney Molly Munger, who topped all donors for the ballot measures, giving $44 million to her campaign. Voters easily rejected that initiative, and Munger conceded at an election night party in downtown Los Angeles.

“Obviously, this is not the outcome we all hoped for, but transformational change can take a long time and we all know that,” Munger told supporters. She congratulated Brown for a well-run campaign, but her supporters seemed less enthusiastic, offering only a smattering of applause.

Pricey campaigns

In all, the campaigns for and against the initiatives raised a whopping $372 million, according to MapLight, a nonpartisan research group that tracks political spending.

A hedge fund billionaire financed the campaign for a third tax question, which would repeal a loophole pushed by Republicans in the Legislature in 2009 that allows out-of-state companies to set their own tax rate and put California-based companies at a disadvantage. The $1 billion a year to be raised if voters approve Proposition 39 would be split for the first five years between the state general fund and energy efficiency improvements for public buildings. After five years, all the revenue would be directed to the state general fund.

Unions and other Democratic interests have spent at least $75 million in an attempt to defeat Proposition 32, an initiative aimed at thwarting the political influence of unions. Corporate interests and wealthy Republicans have spent as much as $60 million in favor of the initiative, with some of that money also going into the effort to defeat Brown’s tax initiative.

The anti-union initiative follows conflicts in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana and elsewhere, where Republican efforts to weaken organized labor have produced protests and political tumult.

Donation revealed

After a contentious last-minute legal fight that went to the state Supreme Court, it was revealed Monday that an $11 million donation to a group backing the anti-union initiative and opposing Brown’s tax plan came from two groups that have spent millions on conservative causes nationwide. The Arizona nonprofit that funneled the money into California declined to reveal the original source of the contribution, however.

A proposal to abolish the state’s death penalty was trailing in early returns. It would convert the sentences of the 726 inmates on California’s death row to life in prison without the possibility of parole. A plan to revise California’s three-strikes law to ensure that a final crime must be serious for felons to qualify captured 68.7 percent support.

Another contentious initiative that would require most genetically engineered food and produce sold in supermarkets and other outlets to be labeled was also trailing in early returns Tuesday. The GMO foods would be barred from calling themselves “natural” on their labels.

Voters easily approved new Senate district maps that were drawn for the first time by a voter-approved independent panel of citizens.

Other statewide propositions include revisions to the state budget process that would have lawmakers draft two-year spending plans, an attempt by an insurance magnate to give auto insurance companies more leeway in setting their rates.

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service