Merced dentist accused in sex case to face trial

vpatton@mercedsun-star.comFebruary 11, 2013 

A dentist accused of sexually abusing four patients will stand trial for the alleged offenses, a Merced County judge decided Monday.

Sang Hyuk Park, who faces a total of six sexual abuse counts, is accused of exposing himself to the women and touching them inappropriately while they were under sedation at his former Park Avenue office in Merced.

Park, 43, has pleaded not guilty to the charges. His attorney, Thomas Johnson, said his client steadfastly denies allegations.

Judge Donald Proietti decided there was ample evidence to move the case forward to trial after hearing more than two hours of testimony from Merced Police Detective Raquel Rios, the lead investigator in the case.

Under questioning from Chief Deputy District Attorney Rob Carroll, Rios testified the first woman, who worked for Park as an assistant, reported being sedated on two occasions in October, while having dental fillings done by Park.

On the first occasion, the woman claimed she awoke to find Park beginning to pull down her pants, and holding a stethoscope on her breast.

The woman had a second procedure, Rios said, after there were still problems with her teeth. The woman claimed Park sedated her again, and she awoke with her pants and underwear around her ankles, and Park taking photographs of her.

The woman also told police Park had exposed himself, and asked her to touch him.

Rios said police set up a phone call between the woman and Park, which was recorded by law enforcement. During the call, the woman asked Park about the illicit pictures he allegedly took. Rios said Park apologized, and told the woman he had deleted them.

"His response was as though he had been caught," Rios told Carroll, under questioning.

Rios testified other women then came forward, giving similar stories about being sedated by Park and being touched inappropriately. Some of the women said the incidents dated back to 2011, but claimed they didn’t come forward because they felt embarrassed and thought no one would believe them.

Under cross examination by Johnson, Rios acknowledged some of the victims did return to Park for treatment after the alleged incidents happened.

The detective also acknowledged some of the alleged victims were employed by Park and continued working for him after some of the abuse supposedly happened.

After Monday's hearing, Johnson said those facts will play an important part of the defense's case.

"Certainly we're litigating on the fact that they all continued treatment with him," Johnson said. "Some of them worked there. Some of them were assisting in the same procedures that the district attorney alleges are assaults … At trial we think it gets a lot better for us."

Carroll said even if the women did return to Park for treatment, it doesn't diminish the allegations.

"It's a situation where (victims) sometimes don't know who to tell. They don’t know what to do," the prosecutor said. "It doesn't make it any less of a crime, and doesn't make (the women) any less of a victim. We have strong evidence. Not only do we have multiple victims, we have a pre-text phone call where (Park) confessed to many of the allegations. We have a very solid case."

An administrative law judge in early December temporarily suspended Park's dental license.

The state attorney general’s office brought a case against Park on behalf of the state’s dental board because of the criminal case pending against him in Merced County.

Park remains free on bail.

His next court appearance is scheduled for March 13.

City Editor Victor A. Patton can be reached at (209) 385-2431 or vpatton@mercedsun-star.com.

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service