Today
82°F
52°F
Sun
81°F
50°F
Mon
79°F
57°F
Tue
77°F
52°F
Wed
80°F
50°F
Search for
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print Order Reprints 0 comments
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Opinion - Letters to the Editor

Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013

Nathan Mackin: 'Regulated' didn't mean 'restrict' ...

In "Note entire 2nd Amendment" (Feb. 8, Letters) the writer asserted that the language of the Second Amendment specifically authorizes regulation of arms, noting the portion that states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state ..."

His deduction relies upon a modern interpretation of the word "regulated." If the writer were to study the Constitution and history a bit better, he would find that "regulated" was once used in what is now an obsolete way.

The intent and meaning of "well regulated" in regards to a military force, at the time the Constitution was framed, was to say "properly disciplined." See, among other historical documents, Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper No. 29 for a better understanding of "well regulated" in its proper historical context.

NATHAN MACKIN Merced

Quick Job Search