San Jose Mercury News: FDA policy putting people in peril

February 19, 2013 

Excerpted from the San Jose Mercury News.

The Food and Drug Administration's gutless approach to antibiotic use in food animals is a disgrace. It's only a matter of time before the policy makes routine infections in people difficult or impossible for doctors to treat. Scientists have been begging the FDA for three decades to ban or severely reduce farmers' use of penicillins and tetracyclines in animal feed to stimulate growth. The American Medical Association and the Union of Concerned Scientists agree that antibiotics in animals consumed by humans dramatically reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics used by people.

The Obama administration should have followed the lead of the European Union and banned antibiotic use by ranchers for healthy animals. The FDA instead continues to put the profits of the meat industry over the health of Americans.

After an outcry from scientists in 2011, the FDA's only concession was to formally ask pharmaceutical companies to voluntarily reduce sales of antibiotics for use in food animals. The results were predictable. The FDA revealed last week that sales of the two most commonly used antibiotics in livestock and poultry increased for the second consecutive year.

A Centers for Disease Control-sponsored study showed that antibiotic-resistant infections cost Americans in excess of $20 billion every year. Several studies also indicate that overuse of antibiotics in animals is leading to more dangerous forms of Salmonella, E coli, and urinary tract and blood infections. They fear the development of some new form of infection that won't respond to known drugs.

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service