Valley residents get a rail meeting close to home

tsheehan@fresnobee.comMarch 19, 2013 

FRESNO -- The California High-Speed Rail Authority holds most of its board meetings in Sacramento. But a special teleconference meeting Monday offered Fresno-area residents a chance to attend without making the three-hour haul up Highway 99.

About two dozen people -- including members of Kings County's grassroots opposition group Citizens for California High-Speed Rail Accountability -- crammed into a conference room in the downtown Fresno office of developer Tom Richards, who is one of the authority board's vice chairmen, for a teleconference that originated from the state treasurer's office in Sacramento.

The meeting was for the rail board to consider an agreement with the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Authority, which oversees the Caltrain commuter train system between San Francisco and Gilroy. The agreement covers joint planning of Caltrain upgrades so its tracks can be used by high-speed trains as part of a "blended" high-speed rail system connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles through the San Joaquin Valley.

The rail board was stymied from voting on the issue about two weeks ago when member Lynn Schenk of San Diego announced that she would vote against the planning agreement. This time around, the board approved the agreement on a 5-0 vote -- the bare minimum needed from a board with three vacancies among its nine allotted seats. Schenk was absent from Monday's teleconference.

Four board members attended by way of teleconference from remote locations across the state. Balky technology hampered those in Richards' office from hearing some of the speakers in Sacramento, Redwood City and Costa Mesa.

The Kings County contingent are regulars at high-speed rail meetings, but also on hand Monday in Fresno were Madera County Supervisor Manuel Nevarez and Ed Graveline of Clovis, a former member of the High-Speed Rail Authority board from its earliest days between 1997 and 2001.

"I rarely miss a meeting, whether it's in the Bay Area or Sacramento or Los Angeles," Graveline said. "I have a bit of history, and I'm just interested in seeing the authority move forward with its plans."

Graveline said he hoped to learn about the authority's goal for 30 percent of work building the initial stretches of high-speed rail in the valley to go to local small businesses. While that issue wasn't on Monday's agenda, he expressed dismay that the efforts had been shifted to a community benefit agreement that some opponents have decried as a project labor agreement ensuring that the bulk of jobs would be filled by union workers.

"There's been a union representative on the authority board from Day 1, but I never thought we'd get to a point where, regardless of where you are in the state, you'd be folded into a union or have to pay into a union pension fund to get work on the project," Graveline said after the meeting. "It seems like a real bummer to put that on the backs of the local contracting or engineering firms."

The planning agreement approved Monday between the high-speed rail board and Caltrain envisions a partnership to achieve a $1.4 billion upgrade to the Caltrain system, including more than $700 million from the rail authority to improve signaling systems and electrify the line for electric trains by 2019. The planning of the Caltrain improvements comes as the rail authority prepares to begin construction this year on its first stretch of dedicated high-speed tracks in Madera and Fresno counties.

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service