Today
82°F
48°F
Sat
83°F
52°F
Sun
82°F
52°F
Mon
73°F
56°F
Tue
77°F
50°F
Search for
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print Order Reprints 0 comments
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Business - Agriculture

Wednesday, Mar. 20, 2013

Residents skeptical of high-speed rail options

- The Fresno Bee

FAIRMEAD -- What was once called a "spaghetti bowl" of 14 potential high-speed rail routes in and around Chowchilla has been narrowed to four, and residents got their first close-up look at how their town could be affected during a workshop Wednesday.

More than 100 people showed up at the Galilee Missionary Baptist Church in Fairmead, five miles south of Chowchilla, for the event hosted by the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

Large tabletop maps detailed four alternatives for what engineers call the "Chowchilla Wye," a Y-shaped junction where high-speed tracks will branch off from the initial Merced-Bakersfield line to head west toward Gilroy and San Jose. Three of the routes run along Highway 152 between Gilroy and Chowchilla, while a fourth follows Avenue 21, about two miles south of Highway 152.

Two options would send 220-mph electric trains around Chowchilla to the west near Road 13, while two others would bypass the city on the east, near Road 18.

Engineers and planners fielded questions from curious -- and sometimes skeptical -- residents.

Kate Knutson, whose family has 60 acres south of Highway 152 near Road 16, learned that on three of the route options, a traffic overpass over Highway 152 and the high-speed tracks would encroach on property planted in grapes and pasture.

"I don't want either one," she said of the routes. "I feel like it's being rammed down our throats."

"We'd be better off if they spent this money for education," added Knutson, the business services director at Chowchilla High School.

Chowchilla farmer Kole Upton said he was pleased to see that none of the routes go through his property. An earlier option, he said, had the potential to put him out of business because it ran across one of his farms at an angle that would make it useless for agriculture.

"On a micro level, I feel better because (the authority) has done an honest job of working with us," he said.

Upton reserved comment on the larger issue of high-speed rail's effect on agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley. He is a board member of two organizations that, along with Madera County and others, are suing the rail authority over the Merced-Fresno route.

Last Wednesday's workshop and another session Wednesday in Chowchilla represent the start of a new stage of analysis, including an environmental report and rounds of public hearings. As the authority prepares to start building the first section of the line in the Fresno-Madera area this summer, authority CEO Jeffrey Morales said the agency is speeding up the analysis of the Chowchilla Wye in preparation to build northward toward Merced if finances allow.

The authority has about $6 billion available -- a combination of rail and stimulus money from the federal government and money from Proposition 1A, a 2008 high-speed rail bond -- to build a line from east of Madera to near Bakersfield.

The draft environmental impact report for the Chowchilla Wye could be released this summer, and a final choice on the route could come in the spring of 2014, said Gary Kennerley, a project manager working for consulting firm Parsons Brinckerhoff on behalf of the rail authority.

Quick Job Search