Roger Wood: Beware of Proposition 42

May 30, 2014 

The headline for Proposition 42 on our June 3 ballot sounds wonderful: “Public records, open meetings, state reimbursement to local agencies.” Please make sure you read the fine print.

In the middle of the paragraph is: “Eliminates reimbursement for costs of compliance. Fiscal impact: Reductions in state payments to local governments in the tens of millions of dollars annually.”

Now you know why state legislators are suddenly in favor of more open government.

The Legislature wants to remove its obligation to pay local governments for the costs of meeting state-mandated freedom of information requests.

Join me in voting no on Proposition 42.

ROGER WOOD

Atwater

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service