J.D. Wibright: Arms business unfairly singled out

June 16, 2014 

The two letters to the editor, “Gun ad inappropriate” and “Gun ad bad way to earn dollars” (Letters, June 10), regarding the “inappropriate” gun ad, highlight a disturbing way of thinking and misplaced blame.

Was it the gun that killed in Santa Barbara, or was it the “troubled young man” that did the killing? I think we can all agree that a gun has never been guilty of killing anyone, just as a spoon or fork has never been guilty of causing obesity.

Also, we don’t blame the car when someone decides to get drunk before getting behind the wheel and killing someone. By the reasoning of the authors of these letters, the Sun-Star should not print any ads for car dealerships, for fear of disrespecting the families of drunken driving tragedies.

Obviously, that would be absurd – as absurd as complaining about a law- and regulation-abiding local gun shop running a sale ad. As is the case with most arguments of gun control proponents, these just don’t make sense.

J.D. Wibright, Merced

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service