Financial regulator seeks powers to curb excess speculation

06/04/2009 2:50 PM

06/04/2009 3:35 PM

WASHINGTON — Firing the opening shot in a likely battle with Wall Street, the federal regulator who's overseeing the trading of oil contracts asked Congress on Thursday for broad powers to regulate the exotic private contracts that are thought to contribute to rising oil prices and the global financial crisis.

Testifying before the Senate Agriculture Committee, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler told lawmakers that he needs broad authority to bring all derivatives contracts under regulatory supervision. Derivatives involve bets that derive their value based on future prices of some underlying asset, such as oil contracts, interest rates, currency or even bonds and other forms of credit.

The new commission chief also called for an additional set of rules for swaps dealers, big global financial institutions that dominate activity in these markets. These rules would force players on both sides of a transaction in these markets to set aside cash to cover potential losses.

The global financial system nearly collapsed during the last four months of 2008 after the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department rescued insurance giant American International Group. AIG was rescued because it had issued trillions of dollars in insurance-like private derivatives contracts and had insufficient reserves to cover its losses.

"The current financial crisis has taught us that the derivatives trading activities of a single firm can threaten the entire financial system and that all such firms should be subject to robust federal regulation," Gensler said.

However, private-sector players such as farming giant Cargill Inc. warned of unintended consequences from forcing companies to post more cash on trades. The proposed changes will cause "a significant drain on working capital at a time when capital is highly constrained and credit is in short supply," said David Dines, the president of risk management for Cargill.

Gensler's proposals seek to curb excessive speculation in these complex markets. They'd standardize many contracts and have them clear on an exchange, much like regulated products on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

If Congress grants the commission's wishes, big Wall Street players such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase and others would be subject to capital requirements, new business-conduct rules and more extensive reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

On the job officially for eight days, Gensler saw his confirmation held up in the Senate for months until the Obama administration publicly came out with a proposal to regulate derivatives. Some Democratic senators, concerned that massive amounts of bets in unregulated markets are partly behind rising oil prices, wanted proof that the administration was serious about taking on Wall Street.

"We can't continue to do what we've been doing," said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, adding that he hoped to pass a derivatives-regulation bill by fall.

A former Goldman Sachs partner, Gensler was a controversial pick by President Barack Obama because while Gensler was a top Treasury official in the Clinton administration, he pushed for deregulation in these markets that led to the excesses that brought the globe to the brink of financial catastrophe last year.

Gensler has acknowledged that Clinton-era deregulation went too far. He told Senate appropriators earlier this week that he thought that these unregulated markets had helped push oil prices to record highs last summer and might be doing so again.

"I do think that, looking back, looking back in that period . . . when oil prices peaked in last summer, that a contributing factor — not the only factor, because there were many, many factors, but a contributing factor — to the commodity asset bubble was index investors and other financial investors," he said Tuesday.

Some analysts think that big Wall Street firms, acting as the main drivers in derivatives markets, have encouraged big institutional investors such as pension funds to bet heavily on rising prices for commodities. Their massive financial flows are thought to be partly behind rising oil prices.

Lynn Stout, a professor of securities law at the University of California-Los Angeles, has studied the history of derivatives regulation. She told lawmakers Thursday that her research shows that unregulated derivatives almost always are associated with asset price bubbles like last year's run-up in oil prices.

In the 12-month period that ended last July, oil prices rose from $70 a barrel to a record $147, then collapsed below $40 in the fall amid the global financial crisis. This year oil prices have rebounded by 85 percent, and Goldman Sachs on Thursday forecast them to go to $85 a barrel this year.

This year's rise happened even as oil inventories are near record highs and demand has hovered around a 10-year low. It's led some to conclude that oil prices now are divorced from supply and demand, and that Americans are paying more because speculators drive up prices by betting hundreds of billions on oil contracts.

"Americans are flat on their backs and will not tolerate gas prices reaching $3 and $4" a gallon again," Michael Masters, a hedge fund manager who's frequently called to testify on the role of speculators, told lawmakers Thursday.

ON THE WEB

Statement of Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler

Statement of UCLA professor Lynn Stout

Testimony of David Dines, the president of Cargill Risk Management

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

To ask a question about this story or any economic question, go to McClatchy's economy Q&A

Why low oil prices now may mean higher oil prices later

BofA says it's near $34 billion goal set by regulators

Can a government of politicians keep politics out of GM?

Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy'sPlanet Washington

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service