Column Extra: Read the Sherles v. SEIU Local 1000 sexual harassment lawsuit documents
12/19/2013 11:14 AM
12/19/2013 11:29 AM
In case you missed it, this week’s State Worker column looks at the sexual harassment lawsuit Franchise Tax Board employee Mechelle Sherles brought against her union, SEIU Local 1000. A judge recently sided with the union, which argued that Sherles was a state employee (on union paid leave to bargain contracts) when a Local 1000 staffer allegedly kissed her and sent her sexually explicit text messages. Her lawsuit alleged that other union officials mistreated her physically and emotionally after she tried to resolve the harassment internally.
Judge David Brown agreed with the union’s position that since Sherles wasn’t a union employee, she couldn’t sue the union as her employer.
You can download the voluminous court records from the Sacramento Superior Court website, by plugging case no. 34-2011-00114745 into its documents and tentative rulings search engine. Here are some of the key filings in the case:
Susy Dellacasa-MIlls declaration in support of Sherles case (Dellacasa-MIlls was union attorney Paul Harris’ secretary)
SEIU Local 1000’s objection to Sherles’ evidence (including statements by Dallacasa-Mills)
With just 400 to 450 words for our weekly State Worker column, much of what we learn each week never sees print. Column Extras give you some of the notes, the quotes, the documents and the observations that inform what's published.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.