Fiscal analyst gives Jerry Brown’s budget high marks
01/13/2014 9:15 PM
10/22/2014 1:59 PM
The Legislature’s nonpartisan fiscal analyst said Monday that Gov. Jerry Brown’s new spending plan “would place California on an even stronger fiscal footing,” broadly praising the budget plan in the office’s initial review.
The report came as Brown touched off a two-day swing through inland California, pushing a $68 billion high-speed rail project and other elements of his budget plan.
“The governor’s emphasis on debt repayment is a prudent one,” the Legislative Analyst’s Office said. “Overall, the governor’s proposal would place California on an even stronger fiscal footing, continuing California’s budgetary progress.”
Still, the LAO expressed reservations about the proposal’s lack of strings attached to higher education funding and the use of fees paid by carbon producers for high-speed rail.
Brown last week released a $154.9 billion budget that includes modest increases for social services and schools, but also billions of dollars to pay down long-term debt.
The LAO praised Brown for proposing a rainy-day fund, saying that “in general, setting aside money for a rainy day is exactly what the state should be doing when revenues are soaring, as they are now.” However, the analyst suggested the fund proposed by Brown may be too unwieldy, and it recommended considering simpler reserve plans.
The LAO also recommended putting some money aside to address the struggling state teachers’ retirement fund. Brown’s budget plan does not commit money to the fund but pledges to “begin working” on ways to stabilize the fund.
Brown’s proposal to use $250 million in proceeds from the state’s cap-and-trade program to help finance California’s high-speed rail project is one of the more controversial elements of his plan. The LAO said the proposal “likely would not maximize the reduction” of greenhouse gas emissions, as the project will not be finished by 2020. It called the proposal “legally risky.”
Brown objected to the criticism at a news conference in Fresno.
“I believe it’s legal; my lawyers believe it’s lawful,” he said. “It’s a very appropriate source of funding.”
Some environmentalists have criticized the use of cap-and-trade money for rail, saying other projects could reduce greenhouse gas emissions more immediately.
“Yes, it’s long-term,” Brown said. “But we aren’t all, you know, Twitter-holics that have to have instant gratification after 140 characters. We can take a few years and build for the future, and that’s my sense here, that I’m coming back to be governor after all these years. ... It’s been on my list for a long time, and I think we’ve got to get it done. And we do need that funding, and it’s legal, and I hope the Legislature will support it.”
On higher education, the legislative analyst criticized Brown for including broad goals for higher education – including reducing costs and increasingly timely degree completion – but tying funding only to keeping tuition rates flat.
“This approach diminishes the Legislature’s role in key policy decisions and allows the universities to pursue their own interests rather than the broader public interest,” the analyst said.
Brown spent the day meeting with law enforcement, agriculture, education and other interests and touring a downtown Fresno pedestrian mall. He was pressed at a meeting with water officials to declare a drought emergency, which could accelerate some federal relief measures.
Asked if he would declare a drought, Brown said, “Not today, but we’re certainly getting ready.”
Brown, who is preparing for a likely re-election bid this year, was scheduled to hold meetings in Bakersfield and Riverside today.
Brown released his annual spending plan last week, setting the stage for months of budget talks at the Capitol. The LAO said there is “a significant possibility” that revenue estimates “will rise by a few billion dollars” by the time Brown releases his budget revision in May.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.