Capitol Alert: Assembly Democrats urge California teacher retirement fix
01/29/2014 11:30 AM
01/29/2014 3:06 PM
With California facing a massive teacher pension shortfall, Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez, D-Los Angeles, unveiled an effort Wednesday he hopes would fully fund the system.
An influx of revenue has allowed California to emerge from years of yawning deficits and protracted budget fights, and the pressure is mounting for the state to do something about an avalanche of liabilities that runs into the hundreds of billions.
Of those looming obligations, a substantial chunk comes from the gap between how much the California State Teachers Retirement System takes in and how much it will owe retired educators. Gov. Jerry Brown estimated in his budget this year that the liability has grown to $80.4 billion and would require a $4.5 billion annual infusion to balance the books.
"While we know our revenues will fluctuate up and down, our long-term liabilities are enormous and ever growing," Brown said in his State of the State speech earlier this month.
Pérez calculates the liability at $71 billion, somewhat lower than Brown. And on Wednesday, the speaker called for a plan that potentially includes increased contributions from all three contributors to the system -- the state, school districts and individual teachers.
"Further delays only mean further costs and further exposure for the state's General Fund," Pérez said. "The fix," he added, "must begin this year."
The process will likely get underway with a February hearing, said Assemblyman Rob Bonta, D-Alameda, chair of the Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security Committee.
"Since the contribution rates for CalSTRS are set by the Legislature and not the retirement board," as is the case with the California Public Employees Retirement System, "it is the responsibility of the governor and the Legislature to determine the best way to address the funding shortfall," Bonta said.
Regardless of how contributions from teachers and districts might change, Pérez said, California retains an obligation to support the retirement fund,
"The state created this fund in the first place," Pérez said, adding that "for us to suggest that we back out at this point would create an undue toll on those other funding sources.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.