Kathy Mills: The growing cost of firefighting
07/20/2013 2:31 AM
07/20/2013 2:32 AM
They say that a law passed in 2011 is meant to offset the growing cost of firefighting. Who should be targeted for this unfair tax? The people who start the fires.
Last year, my neighbor and I had to speak to another neighbor and tell him not to mow at noon in tall, dry grass on a very hot day.
There are a lot of prevention signs that tell you not to mow or weed after 10 a.m.
Who are these supporters, who have an extra $150 lying around and think money is just to pay for firefighting? Only a small portion helps with prevention and the rest goes into a general fund.
Why should people who live in a state response area be charged, when California has earthquakes, mudslides, tsunamis and floods? I believe the state insurance companies should approach each case and determine who's guilty. If you have the required clearance, that means you are complying with the law.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
Merced Sun-Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.