PITTS: Once again, parents exploit kids for fame

And now, a rebuttal from inside the cotton-wool tunnel.

That, according to Laurence Sunderland, is the safe, heavily padded place where critics of him, his wife Marianne, and their 16-year-old daughter Abby live, cushioned from life's dangers and risks. If the names sound familiar, there's a reason. Abby Sunderland is the California girl whose attempt to become the youngest person to circumnavigate the globe ended in near tragedy when her boat became crippled by storms in the Indian Ocean. Laurence and Marianne let her go.

The girl was found and rescued last week, but her brush with disaster has earned her folks international reproach. A writer on a Los Angeles Times message board called them "moron parents." A reader of The Herald Sun in Australia accused them of "child abuse and neglect." But the Sunderlands are unrepentant. The issue, says Laurence Sunderland, a boat builder, is not his daughter's age, but her competence; she has been sailing all her life. He sees his family — including teenage son Zac, who sailed the globe last year, as adventurers. "Sailing and life in general is dangerous," he told the Associated Press. "Teenagers drive cars. Does that mean teenagers shouldn't drive a car? I think people who hold that opinion have lost their zeal for life. They're living in a cotton-wool tunnel to make everything safe."

But the hole in Sunderland's logic is wide enough to sail a crippled boat through. Yes, driving is dangerous — though probably not as dangerous as sailing alone around the world. If you don't take that relatively small risk, though, your ability to get from Point A to Point B and indeed, your very independence, are significantly compromised. There is a compelling reason to drive.

There was no compelling reason for Abby's voyage. She was hardly Ferdinand Magellan seeking a western route to the Spice Islands.

Rather, she was a teenager from Thousand Oaks whose parents allowed her to risk her life in search of a dubious and ultimately, meaningless, record.

The effort to rescue her involved the Australian Maritime Safety Authority, a search plane and a French fishing boat. According to Australian newspapers, this will cost taxpayers there hundreds of thousands of dollars. Not to mention the risk for the sailors who saved Abby; the French captain fell into the ocean and had to be rescued himself.

All that, and for what? Well, it will surprise no one to hear the Sunderlands were shopping a reality show. Laurence claims he pulled out of "Adventures in Sunderland" before Abby sailed, when it became clear he and the producers had dissimilar visions. He wanted an inspirational program celebrating a family of daredevils and risk-takers; they wanted to chronicle what they saw as a family sending a daughter off to certain death.

Cynical as they might have been, his erstwhile partners evidently had a clearer view of things than Sunderland did.

There are obvious echoes here. Echoes of the Heene family whose balloon boy hoax last year was tied to a TV reality show proposal. And of Jessica Dubroff, who died in a crash at 7 while attempting, before TV cameras, to become the youngest pilot ever to fly across the country.

The common thread? Parents narcissistic enough to believe they belonged on television and calculating enough to exploit their own children to get there. Perhaps that is only to be expected in an era where fame has become downsized and cheapened until it is a thing seemingly anyone can have if they are, or do something, outlandish enough.

Laurence Sunderland surely qualifies. He sent his daughter to sea all alone for no good reason. But for the grace of God, she would be dead now.

And the view from inside the cotton-wool tunnel is looking better all the time.

Write Pitts at