Politics & Government

Merced residents voice frustration after governor signs stringent gun bills

Owner Gerry Mitchell, 55, speaks about the new gun control measures signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, at Gunrunner Gun Shop and Shooting Range, 2040 Yosemite Parkway in Merced, Calif., on Friday, July 1, 2016. The laws will require people to turn in high-capacity magazines and mandate background checks for ammunition sales.
Owner Gerry Mitchell, 55, speaks about the new gun control measures signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, at Gunrunner Gun Shop and Shooting Range, 2040 Yosemite Parkway in Merced, Calif., on Friday, July 1, 2016. The laws will require people to turn in high-capacity magazines and mandate background checks for ammunition sales. akuhn@mercedsun-star.com

Jack Hudson set down his .45 Long Colt on Friday afternoon at the Gunrunner Shooting Range and sighed, frustrated by news of six new stringent gun-control measures signed earlier in the day by Gov. Jerry Brown.

The new measures, which will require people to turn in high-capacity magazines and mandate background checks for ammunition sales, come as California Democrats seek to strengthen gun laws that already are among the strictest in the nation.

Hudson, a 75-year-old Merced resident, shook his head and said the measures were “ridiculous” and wouldn’t make anybody safer.

“Honestly, I read about those first two and was too mad to read the rest,” Hudson told the Sun-Star.

Brown vetoed five other bills, including requirements to register homemade firearms and report lost or stolen weapons to authorities.

The Democratic governor’s action is consistent with his mixed record on gun control. Some of the enacted bills duplicate provisions of a November ballot measure by Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. Some of the vetoed measures also appear in Newsom’s initiative.

“My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners,” Brown wrote in a one-sentence message to lawmakers.

Gerry Mitchell, owner of Gunrunner in Merced and a gun seller for more than 30 years, said the new measures likely would not have any meaningful effects on public safety.

“It’s just adding paperwork and red tape to the lives of law-abiding citizens, handicapping people who want to obey the laws,” Mitchell said Friday. “It’s sad.”

Gun control measures long have been popular with the Democratic lawmakers who control the California Senate and Assembly. But they stepped up their push this year after the December shooting in San Bernardino by a couple who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.

Advocates on both sides of the gun-control debate say California has some of the nation’s strictest gun laws. It is one of six states to get the highest grade from the pro-gun control Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

The state’s move to tighten the laws further comes amid years of gridlock at the federal level, which spawned a tense clash in Washington last week as Democrats camped out on the floor of the House of Representatives and shouted down Republicans.

The bills angered Republicans and gun-rights advocates who say Democrats are trampling on Second Amendment rights, creating new restrictions that will not cut off the flow of guns to people intent on using them for nefarious purposes.

“On the eve of Independence Day, independence and freedom and liberty in California has been chopped down at the knees and kicked between the legs,” said Sam Paredes, executive director of the advocacy group Gun Owners of California.

Lawsuits challenging the new laws are likely once they take effect next year, Paredes said.

Brown’s action will require people who own magazines that hold more than 10 rounds to give them up. It extends a 1999 law that made it illegal to buy a high-capacity magazine or to bring one into the state but allowed people who already owned them to keep them.

Mitchell said he supports some aspects of gun control, including background checks. “I like knowing I’m not selling a gun to a bad guy,” he said. “Bad guys are going to get guns, but we don’t have to make it easy for them.”

Mitchell said he doesn’t believe the new magazine measure will work.

“I really don’t think people are going to do it,” he said, adding that enforcement also could be a problem. “Magazines don’t have a date on them and people can still go just over to Reno. So, I think they may have just created another black market.”

He also wondered how the new laws would affect internet purchases.

In an attempt to slow gun users from rapidly reloading, the governor signed a bill outlawing new weapons that have a device known as a bullet button. Gun makers developed bullet buttons to get around California’s assault weapons ban, which prohibited new rifles with magazines that can be detached without the aid of tools. A bullet button allows a shooter to quickly dislodge the magazine using the tip of a bullet or other small tool.

People will be allowed to keep weapons they already own with bullet buttons, which are often referred to as “California compliant.”

Brown also signed into law another attempt to regulate ammunition sales after a law passed in 2009 was struck down by a Fresno County judge who said it was too vague.

The new law will require ammunition sellers to be licensed and buyers to undergo background checks. Transactions will be recorded.

Mitchell said the ammunition measure likely will cause people to “stock up like crazy” before the new law takes effect.

Brown also opted to require a background check before a gun can be loaned to someone who isn’t a family member.

“Strong gun laws work. ... What we’re doing in California is a better job of keeping guns out of dangerous hands,” said Amanda Wilcox, a spokeswoman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, whose daughter was killed by a shooter using a high-capacity magazine.

The governor vetoed an effort to expand a 6-month-old program that allows courts to temporarily restrict gun ownership rights for people suspected of being dangerous and decided against restricting all firearm purchases to one per month, a limitation that already applies to handguns.

Another bill he vetoed would have asked voters to strengthen penalties for stealing a gun, which voters will already be deciding through Newsom’s initiative. The ballot measure also will ask voters to require reporting of lost and stolen firearms – an idea Brown rejected Friday and has rejected at least twice before.

“I continue to believe that responsible people report the loss or theft of a firearm and irresponsible people do not; it is not likely that this bill would change that,” he wrote in a veto message.

Merced area gun owners such as Mitchell and Hudson worry the new laws will hamstring responsible citizens without directly addressing the causes of gun violence.

“They can’t keep guns out of the hands of criminals; how are they going to keep the ammunition away?” Mitchell wondered. “They’re just making more paperwork for everyone so they (lawmakers) can feel like they’ve done something.”

Jonathan J. Cooper and Don Thompson of The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Rob Parsons: 209-385-2482

This story was originally published July 1, 2016 at 6:00 PM with the headline "Merced residents voice frustration after governor signs stringent gun bills."

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER